Legal Opinion

Bazemore v. . Mountain

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1900Published

(Vn AotioN for necessary family and farming supplies furnished the feme defendant for the support of herself and her family for the year 1894, tried before Hoke, at May Term, 1899, of the Superior Court of Bertie County.

Read the full summary

(Vn AotioN for necessary family and farming supplies furnished the feme defendant for the support of herself and her family for the year 1894, tried before Hoke, at May Term, 1899, of the Superior Court of Bertie County. The ■complaint alleged that she was the-owner of several tracts of land (describing them), and of personal property (describing it), and that the entire support of the family devolves upon her, and that she has no other source of income than arises from her said lands. The plaintiff’s prayer is for judgment for his debt, and that said judgment be specifically and specially…

1Opinion of the Court

DeKENuaNts' Appeal.

Furches, J.

We consider first the defendants’ appeal, for the reason that it is much fuller than the record in the plaintiff’s appeal — containing the evidence and charge of the Court, which is not set out in the transcript of the plaintiff’s appeal.

This case was here at Eall Term, 1897, upon a judgment of nonsuit, and appeal by the plaintiff — reported in 121 N. C., 59. In that case, under the repeated rulings of this Court, we were compelled to take every fact which plaintiff’s evidence tended to prove, as proved; and under this rule of construction, we set aside the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farthing v. . ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Jones v. CraigmilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  3. Bates v. SultanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  4. Bazemore v. . MountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  5. Ulman v. . MacESupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API