Legal Opinion

Ulman v. . MacE

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

This was a civil ACTION, heard before Graves, J., at the Spring Term, 1894, of CraveN Superior Court. Judgment by default having already been entered against the defendant U. S. Mace, the action was heard as to the defendant Ella R. Mace only.

Read the full summary

This was a civil ACTION, heard before Graves, J., at the Spring Term, 1894, of CraveN Superior Court. Judgment by default having already been entered against the defendant U. S. Mace, the action was heard as to the defendant Ella R. Mace only. The plaintiffs, at the preceding term of Court, having been allowed to amend their complaint as to the defendant Ella R. Mace, filed the following amendments to said complaint, which alone are material, and present the points involved in the demurrer: “1. That,as the plaintiffs are advised,informed and believe, the contracts for the goods, wares and…

1Opinion of the Court

Pee, Cukiam::

His Honor was probably unaware of the unreported case of Jones v. Craigmiles, 114 N. C., 613, in which it was held that the property should be described.

Reversed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. CraigmilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wade Ex Rel. Moore v. McLean Contracting Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Bazemore v. . MountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  3. Bazemore v. . MountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API