Corrugated Paper Patents Co. v. Paper Working Mach. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
In Equity. Suit by the Corrugated Paper Patents Company against the Paper Working Machine Company of New York.
1Opinion of the Court
LEARNED HAND, District Judge.
Four points are raised in this case; (1) Jurisdiction; (2) validity; (3) infringement; (4) plaintiffs inequitable conduct.
[1] I do not believe that Judge Lacombe, in Streat v. American Rubber Co. (C. C.) 115 Fed. 634, meant to hold that, although the point of jurisdiction is taken after general appearance, nevertheless it is good. Judge Beatty, in U. S., etc., Co. v. Phœnix, etc., Co. (C. C.) 124 Fed. 234, suggests with much justice that in that case the only suggested infringement anyway was in the Southern district of New York, and that therefore, when Judge…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Trice v. ComstockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Clark Thread Co. v. Willimantic Linen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Harvey v. VarneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harms v. CohenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1922
- Corrugated Fiber Co. v. Paper Working Machines Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1919
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Hudson Auto Supply Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1930
- Colonial Book Co. v. Amsco School Publications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
- Hollywood Comb Curler, Inc. v. Glemby Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942