Legal Opinion

Carson v. Butt

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 13, 1896PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from, the District Court of Pottawatomie County. Action brought April 15, 1892, by J. U. Carson to Rave May Butt declared a trustee for bis benefit in certain real estate situated in Tecumseh, Pottawatomie county. Judgment below in favor of Carson. Butt brings up the case. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dale, C. J.:

J. U. Carson filed in the district court of Pottawatomie county, his complaint against May Butt, alleging, in substance that he settled and made valuable improvements upon a certain town lot situated in Tecumseh, Pottawatomie county. That the deed to said lot had been improperly awarded to said Butt, by the board of townsite commissioners, acting for the townsite of Tecumseh, and asked that Butt be adjudged to hold the legal title to the lot, in trust for the use and benefit of Carson. To this complaint, Butt answered fully, and after reply…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Smith v. KylerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Krutz v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Bennett v. PrestonIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  4. City of Atchison v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  5. Krewson v. CloudIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fraley, Adm'r v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Harn v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Eastwood v. ClinkscalesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Mason v. SloneckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Edwards v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API