Stanley v. Barringer
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Palo Alto District Court. — Hon. Geo. H. Cake, Judge. Action to recover for work and labor performed by the plaintiff for the defendant. Trial by jury. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSeevees, C. J.
The plaintiff seeks to recover, for work and labor performed for the defendant under an express and implied contract. The jury found for the defendant as to the express contract. So far as material to the plaintiff ’ s recovery on the implied contract, the facts are that the plaintiff worked and labored for the defendant for several years as a farm-hand, and he claims he is entitled to recover what his services are reasonably worth. He commenced working for the defendant-in 1880, when he was eighteen years of age, and so continued in such employment until 1886. During this time, his home was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brown v. RoseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- Betts v. City of GlenwoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Kendig v. OverhulserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
- Russell & Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Independent District v. Independent DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hall v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Bunyan v. LoftusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Buhlman v. HumphreySupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Hudson v. Smith Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Lewis v. Roach Manigan Paving Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.