Legal Opinion

Buhlman v. Humphrey

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 24, 1892PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Certiorari to Clayton District Court. — Hon. W. A. Hoyt, Judge. Proceeding by certiorari, instituted in this court by the plaintiffs to test the legality of the action of Hon. W. A. Hoyt, district judge, in refusing to find the defendants guilty of a contempt.

1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.

The record shows that on September 6, 1887, in an action brought by E. B. G-arden and others against Patrick Mullen and Ann Mullen, in Clayton district court, it was adjudged by the court that the defendants therein had been keeping and maintaining a liquor nuisance in a building situated on lot 5 in fractional block 5, in the village of Elkader, in said county. By the decree, “It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that said nuisance be abated, and that the temporary injunction heretofore granted in this case be, and the same is hereby, made perpetual, and the defendants Patrick…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Loughran v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  2. Silvers v. TraverseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  3. Brown v. RoseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  4. Betts v. City of GlenwoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  5. Kendig v. OverhulserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pool v. District Court of the Ninth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Hudson v. Smith Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  3. Dermedy v. JacksonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. Steyer v. McCauleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. Newcomer v. TuckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API