Barnes v. . Teer
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClabksoN, J.
At the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence, the defendant in the general county court for Buncombe County, made motions for judgment as in case of nonsuit. O. S., 567. The court overruled these motions and on appeal to the Superior Court the rulings were sustained. In this we can see no error. The often repeated rule is that the evidence which makes for plaintiff’s claim, or tends to support his cause of action, on a motion to nonsuit, is to be taken in its most favorable light for the plaintiff, and he is entitled to the benefit of every reasonable intendment…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. . WhitesideSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Hicks v. . Love and Bruton v. . LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Hancock v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Davis v. . LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Charnock v. Reusing Light & Refrigerating Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wilson v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- State v. . KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Corum v. ComerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Barnes v. TeerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.