Legal Opinion

Bloom v. Gordan

California Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1907No. S.F. No. 4701PublishedCited by 1 opinion

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from an interlocutory judgment in partition of the Superior Court of the City, and County of San Francisco. Frank H. Kerrigan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal of certain defendants from the interlocutory judgment given in an action for the partition of real property. It is shown by the affidavit of the county clerk that the interlocutory decree in partition and order of sale were entered in the minutes of the court upon December 23, 1905. The interlocutory decree in partition and order of sale were filed with the clerk of the said superior court upon the ninth day of January, 1906. Admittedly, the appeal was not taken until the 18th of March, 1906. Subdivision 3 of section 939 of the Code of Civil…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bartlett v. MacKeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gordan v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API