Legal Opinion

Gordan v. Graham

California Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1908No. S.F. No. 4965PublishedCited by 1 opinion

'APPLICATION for a "Writ of Mandamus directed to-Thomas F. Graham, as judge of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate.

On February 14, 1908, in an action for partition, entitled Rosa. Bloom v. Pauline Gordan, the superior court made an order denying the petitioner’s motion to vacate an order for a writ of assistance theretofore issued therein, directing the sheriff to remove petitioner from the premises involved in the suit and place one Fannie Abrahamson in possession thereof. Desiring to appeal from this order and to obtain a stay of proceedings on the writ pending the appeal, the petitioner applied to the respondent to fix the amount of the undertaking necessary…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pignaz v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Gay v. TorranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Wiedwald v. DodsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Hammond v. CailleaudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Dunn v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Estate of BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API