Bartlett v. MacKey
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. Waldo M. York, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This action is for a partition of two lots in the city of Pasadena. The defendant appeals from an interlocutory judgment, in plaintiff’s favor and from an order denying a new trial.
The appeal from the judgment was taken more than sixty days after the same was entered, and must therefore be disregarded. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 939, subd. 3.) The appeal from the order denying a new trial is left for consideration, and we will dispose of the questions properly arising thereon, omitting all those matters that can be determined only on appeal from the judgment. (Thompson v. Los Angeles,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Thompson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by5 opinions
- Richmond v. DofflemyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Sting v. BeckhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Fonner v. MartensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Bloom v. GordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Dore v. KlumpkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903