Legal Opinion
Ford v. Gilbert
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided December 10, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WADDILL, Commissioner.
We are asked on this appeal whether the trial judge erred in awarding appellee, T. O. Gilbert, $2,470.62 as the balance due for services rendered appellants and in not specifically ruling on a counterclaim.
Appellants, Ralph Ford, Reuben Ford and Lucien Holmes d/b/a Ford-Holman Construction Company, were the successful bidders on a state road contract. Subsequently appellants orally contracted with appellee for him to perform certain work on 1.66 miles of this road. This action was filed by appellee to recover $6,712.76 allegedly owed for certain work done under this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- C. C. Duke and C. T. Duke v. Sun Oil Company and Pan American Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Magill v. LewisNevada Supreme Court · 1958
- Riggs, Ferris & Geer v. Harrison LillibridgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Fergerson v. Utilities Elkhorn Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
- Maurice Wendy v. McLean Trucking CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Oldham's Farm Sausage Co. v. Salco, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- American Oil Co. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967
- Oldham's Farm Sausage Co. v. Salco, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982