Saulsbury v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
BROOKS, Judge.
Appellant was convicted for pursuing the occupation of a peddler in Bell County, without first having paid the occupation tax of $250 fixed by law, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $250.
The agreed statement of facts shows substantially the following: “Appellant admitted that neither he nor his employers, Raterman & Luth,. had paid the tax of $350 fixed by law upon the occupation of peddling out buggies in Texas for the year 1901; and further admitted that he had been, during the months of March and April, 1901, engaged in peddling buggies in Bell County, Texas, and was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hopkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Schollenberger v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Asher v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- L. Miller & Co. v. GoodmanTexas Supreme Court · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Muskegon v. ZeerypMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Edmanson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- In Re GilstrapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Potts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Shed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.