Legal Opinion

Shed v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 26, 1913No. 2289PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of being a traveling person pursuing the occupation of selling patent and other medicines.

The evidence unquestionably shows that appellant had a two-horse hack on which was painted, “Watkins Bemedies”; that he traversed Coryell County, selling these remedies and Watkins spices, etc.; that this was his regular occupation. Appellant himself testified and stated:

“My name is A. T. Shed. I am the defendant'in this case. I understand what I am being tried for. I am principally engaged in selling extracts, spices, flavorings, soaps, perfumes, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Emert v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Cohen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Steinberger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. Saulsbury v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. South v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. South v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Collins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API