Shed v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HARPER, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of the offense of being a traveling person pursuing the occupation of selling patent and other medicines.
The evidence unquestionably shows that appellant had a two-horse hack on which was painted, “Watkins Bemedies”; that he traversed Coryell County, selling these remedies and Watkins spices, etc.; that this was his regular occupation. Appellant himself testified and stated:
“My name is A. T. Shed. I am the defendant'in this case. I understand what I am being tried for. I am principally engaged in selling extracts, spices, flavorings, soaps, perfumes, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Emert v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Cohen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Steinberger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Saulsbury v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
3Cited by4 opinions
- South v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- South v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Collins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1948