Legal Opinion

St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. Braziel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 10, 1930No. 3872PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The contentions of appellant will be disposed of in the order in which they are presented in its brief.

1. It is insisted the judgment should be reversed because the court erred, appellant says, when he overruled its motion for a new trial on the ground that the jury was guilty of misconduct in that "in their deliberation (quoting) before arriving at a verdict" they "mentioned and/or discussed attorneys' fees." At the hearing on said motion four of the jurors testified as witnesses. It appeared from their testimony that the matter of attorneys' fees was mentioned by one of their number, but it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Inman v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of TexasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. St. Louis S.W. Ry. Co. of Texas v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lightsey Black & White Cab Corp. v. LittlefieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API