Legal Opinion
South Slope Holding Corp. v. Board of Assessment Review of Town of Jerusalem
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 2, 1998No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals, order and judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: When these appeals were initially before us, this Court held that petitioners failed to meet their burden of proffering substantial evidence to rebut the presumption of validity of the tax assessments (Matter of South Slope Holding Corp. v Board of Assessment Review, 244 AD2d 891). The Court of Appeals reversed, held that petitioners met their burden of production sufficient to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- FMC Corp. v. UnmackNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Friends of Keuka Lake, Inc. v. DeMayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- South Slope Holding Corp. v. Board of Assessment ReviewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- MATTER OF GRIDLEY BLDG., INC. v. GingoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
3Cited by5 opinions
- South Slope Holding Corp. v. ComstockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- EXCELSIOR v. ASSESSOR, TOWN OF AMHERSTAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Excelsior v. AssessorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Excelsior v. AssessorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- South Slope Holding Corp. v. Board of Assessment Review of Town of JerusalemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998