Legal Opinion
Beverly Enterprises, Inc. v. Herman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 26, 2000No. Civ.A. 97-2475-SSHPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment and their respective oppositions and replies thereto. Upon consideration of the parties’ pleadings and the entire record, the Court grants plaintiffs’ motion and denies defendants’ motion. Although findings of fact and conclusions of law are unnecessary on decisions of motions under Rule 12 or 56, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a); Summers v. Department of Justice, 140 F.3d 1077, 1079-80 (D.C.Cir.1998), the Court sets forth its reasoning.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Beverly Enterprises, Inc., and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Erlenbaugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- F & H Coatings, LLC v. AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- PDK Labs Inc. v. RenoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- National Mining Ass'n v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- ['ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC. v. SHIU']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- ALDEN MANAGEMENT, SERVICES, INC. v. ChaoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.