Legal Opinion
F & H Coatings, LLC v. Acosta
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 20, 2018No. 17-9506PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
F & H Coatings, L.L.C. ("F & H") seeks review of a final order of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission ("Commission"), and asks us to set aside a $7,000 penalty imposed by an administrative law judge ("ALJ"). The ALJ reviewed evidence presented by the Department of Labor ("DOL") during a two-day hearing, and held that the DOL had shown that F & H breached the General Duty Clause of the Occupational Safety and Health Act ("OSH Act"), 29 U.S.C. § 654 (a)(1).
Upon review of the record, we conclude that the ALJ's findings are supported by substantial evidence,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc. v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. NacchioCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Sanderson v. Wyoming Highway PatrolCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Bill Barrett Corporation v. YMC Royalty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- State v. AguirreSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
- Fabrizius v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
- Harris v. Remington Arms CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.