Legal Opinion
United States v. Aimee Jones
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 28, 2006No. 05-4898PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
RESTANI, Judge.
Aimee Jones (“Jones”) appeals her conviction for health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1847(2), arguing that the Government did not establish the essential elements of the crime. Jones also contests her sentence, including the requirement to make restitution to her former employer, Progressive Medical Specialists, Inc. (“Progressive”). We hold that the Government did not establish the elements of health care fraud in violation of § 1347(2) and we will reverse Jones’ conviction and vacate her sentence.
I. Procedural and Factual Background
In February…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. Tamika RileyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Malik NasirCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Ruder v. Pequea Valley School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- United States v. Carlo CastroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- United States v. IntrocasoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.