Legal Opinion

United States v. Tamika Riley

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 16, 2010No. 08-3361, 08-3413, 08-3758, 08-3759PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

RESTANI, Judge.

Defendant-Appellants and Cross-Appellees (“Appellants”) Sharpe James (“James”) and Tamika Riley (“Riley”) were convicted in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey of three counts of mail fraud (Counts 1-3) as part of a scheme to convey City-owned property in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 and 2, one count of fraud (Count 4) involving a local government receiving federal funds in connection with the fraudulent sale of City-owned properties in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(A) and 2, and one count of conspiracy (Count 5) to defraud…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. National Security Systems, Inc. v. IolaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. BerriosCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. Kareem BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. BottiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API