Redd v. State

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for burglary of a vehicle wherein punishment was enhanced to life imprisonment. Appellant claims error was committed by improper prosecution jury argument, undue limitations on voir dire and discovery, and dismissal of a juror.

Appellant’s first through fourth grounds of error concern a claim of improp er jury argument. Careful examination of the record indicates that the statements complained of could be viewed as either a response to appellant’s argument or a reasonable deduction from the evidence but it is not necessary to go that far.…