Sanne v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ODOM, Judge.
These are appeals from convictions for capital murder. Appellants were charged as parties to the offense and were tried together a second time after the first conviction was reversed by this Court. Skillern v. State, 559 S.W.2d 828. Punishment was assessed at death in each case after the jury returned affirmative answers to the punishment issues submitted under Article 37.071, V.A.C.C.P.
Eighteen grounds of error have been raised by Sanne and twenty-three by Skil-lern. For convenience, we will group together for discussion those grounds from the two briefs which touch upon…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by139 opinions
- Tong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Bullington v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fuller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.