Legal Opinion

Hale v. World Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 15, 1904No. 1,233PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern1 District of Ohio.

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, Circuit Judge.

This was a suit brought for an infringement of letters patent No. 634,556, issued to Janies White Hale, complainant (appellant), for an improvement in water stills for the distillation of water for domestic purposes. The court below dismissed-the bill on the ground that the water still manufactured by the defendants (appellees) does not infringe any of, the claims of the patent sued on. From this decree the complainant has appealed.

The Hale still is a simple apparatus, designed for domestic use. It' may be placed on an ordinary range or stove. It consists of three'…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roemer v. PeddieSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Royer v. CoupeSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Thomas v. Rocker Spring Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  4. Campbell Printing-Press & Mfg. Co. v. Duplex Printing-Press Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Columbus Chain Co. v. Standard Chain Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  2. American Stove Co. v. Cleveland Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
  3. Campbell v. American Shipbuilding Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  4. Marshall & Stearns Co. v. Murphy Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
  5. De Long Hook & Eye Co. v. Francis Hook & Eye & Fastener Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API