Legal Opinion

United States v. Roy Mack West, A.K.A. Teeny Man, Etc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided January 26, 2000No. 95-6960PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes before us by order of the United States Supreme Court, which has vacated the judgment of this Court as to appellant Roy Mack West, and remanded the case for our reconsideration in light of Richardson v. United States, 526 U.S. 813, 119 S.Ct. 1707, 143 L.Ed.2d 985(1999). See United States v. West, 142 F.3d 1408 (11th Cir.1998), vacated and remanded, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 2042, 144 L.Ed.2d 211 (1999). In Richardson, the Supreme Court held that “a jury in a federal criminal case brought under [21 U.S.C.] § 848 must unanimously agree not only that the defendant committed some…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. United States v. Jimmy Lee Nixon, Richard Nixon, Michael Parks, Emmitt Lamar Manns, Henry L. Manns, Michael Keeley, Gerald WellsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  3. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roy MacK WEST, A.K.A. Teeny Man, Etc., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. RileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tommy L. Rutledge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. State v. TurnerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. United States v. Roy Toves CabaccangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. WestDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2000
  5. Rutledge, Tommy L. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API