Legal Opinion
Ellis v. County of Broome
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1981PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert E. Fischer, J.
In this negligence action, defendants County of Broome and Thompson move for a protective order (CPLR 3103) upon plaintiffs’ demand for copies of accident reports.
Utilizing the statutory language, defendants assert generally — without singular reference — that the reports sought are “materials prepared for litigation” not obtainable by reason of the specific exclusion contained in CPLR 3101 (subd [d], par 2) and urge that the notice to produce lacks “reasonable particularity” in any event (CPLR 3120, subd [a], par 1, cl [i]).
After identifying by name…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pataki v. KisedaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Carlo v. Queens Transit Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Chaplin v. Pathmark SupermarketsNew York Supreme Court · 1980
- Fisher v. New York State Employees' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Fisher v. New York State Employees' Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harris v. Processed Wood, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Vogl v. Joyce Kilmer Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1983
- Smith v. YoungNew York Supreme Court · 1982