Legal Opinion
United States v. Carl Bradley Johansson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 4, 2001No. 00-50245PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREYER, District Judge:
Appellant Carl Bradley Johansson (“Jo-hansson”) pled guilty to a conspiracy to violate federal regulations which limit the number of hours operators of motor carriers may drive, and to conceal such violations by falsifying records required to be maintained by the United States Department of Transportation (“DOT”). He appeals the district court’s enhancement of his sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1(b)(6)(A) 1 for a fraud offense that involves the conscious or reckless risk of serious bodily injury. He contends (1) that the district court erred in applying a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- United States v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Michael A. RileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Denard NealCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Bryan Lynn ShumateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.