United States v. Alfred Arnold Ameline
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PAEZ, Circuit Judge:
In light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), we granted appellant Alfred Ameline’s petition for rehearing to reconsider our decision in United States v. Ameline, 376 F.3d 967 (9th Cir.2004). In our original opinion, we held that, because Ame-line’s sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines was based on facts found by the district judge by a preponderance of the evidence, his sentence violated the Sixth Amendment as construed by the Supreme. Court in Blakely v. Washington, — U.S. -,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. MaresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Louis F. PiraniCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. David C. Hughes, the Office of the Federal Public Defender, Amicus SupportingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Bernard Chester WebbCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.