Legal Opinion

United States v. South Half of Lot 7 & Lot 8, Block 14

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 3, 1990No. 88-2212NEPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAGG, Circuit Judge.

Despite Congress’s statement in 18 U.S.C. § 1955(d) (1988) that “[a]ny property, including money, used in [an illegal gambling business] may be seized and forfeited to the United States,” the district court held “the words ‘any property’ ... do not encompass real property” and dismissed the forfeiture actions brought by the government against thirteen parcels of real estate allegedly connected with illegal gambling operations. Because the district court’s interpretation finds no support in the plain meaning of the words “any property,” we reverse and remand for further…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. On Leong Chinese Merchants Association BuildingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Premises Located at Route 13Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  5. Rogers v. Boeing Aerospace Operations, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API