In re C.M.A.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
C.M.A.’s birth mother and his adoptive parents appeal a district court order granting the child’s alleged biological father’s motion to vacate an adoption decree. We reverse, concluding as a matter of law that'the statutory notice provisions were not violated, the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children violation does not warrant vacation of the adoption decree, and the failure to identify a biological father not entitled to notice of the proceedings does not constitute fraud upon the court. The alleged biological father asserts ah additional argument raised but…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Halloran v. BLUE AND WHITE LIBERTY CAB CO. INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Hoyt Investment Co. v. Bloomington Commerce & Trade Center AssociatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Marriage of Maranda v. MarandaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. 3598Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Micks v. Gurstel Law Firm, P.C.District Court, D. Maine · 2019
- Ortega-Maldonado v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- C.V. v. J.M.J.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- In Re CMACourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.