Legal Opinion

In Re CMA

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 24, 1996No. C6-96-1507Published

1Opinion of the Court

557 N.W.2d 353 (1996)

In re the Petition to Adopt: C.M.A.

No. C6-96-1507.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 24, 1996.

Suzanne Born, Minneapolis, for Appellant Birth Mother.

Nancy A. Wiltgen, Leonard, Street and Deinard, Minneapolis, for Appellants Adoptive Parents.

Wright S. Walling, Jody Ollyver DeSmidt, Walling & Berg, P.A., Minneapolis, for Respondent Birth Father.

Considered and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and PARKER and LANSING, JJ.

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

C.M.A.'s birth mother and his adoptive parents appeal a district court order granting the child's alleged biological father's motion to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Halloran v. BLUE AND WHITE LIBERTY CAB CO. INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Hoyt Investment Co. v. Bloomington Commerce & Trade Center AssociatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Marriage of Maranda v. MarandaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API