Legal Opinion
Safransky v. Personnel Board
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided March 5, 1974No. 349PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
Two issues are presented on this appeal:
1. Whether there is substantial evidence to show that the appellant is chargeable with the conduct complained of, and
2. Whether there is substantial evidence to show that such conduct, if true, constitutes just cause for discharge.
The procedure involved in an appeal by an employee with permanent status is clear. Sec. 16.05 (1) (e), Stats., states that jurisdiction lies with the State Personnel Board to determine whether the actions of the appointing authority terminating an employee of permanent status is based on just cause. The board must determine…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Stacy v. Ashland County Department of Public WelfareWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. ElsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Gudlin v. Civil Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Reinke v. Personnel BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kernz v. J. L. French Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Peggy BURTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CASCADE SCHOOL DISTRICT UNION HIGH SCHOOL NO. 5 Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- State Ex Rel. New Mexico State Highway Department v. SilvaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Durepos v. Town of Van BurenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- State v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.