Legal Opinion · Dissent

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Pleshaw

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 22, 2011No. Misc. Docket AG No. 43Published

1Dissent

HARRELL, J.,

dissenting, in which MURPHY, J., joins.

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals (“D.C. Court”), on 12 August 2010, disbarred Robert J. Pleshaw (“Pleshaw”) from the practice of law in the District of Columbia (“D.C.”) for an ethical faux-pas he committed in a probate matter in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. As Pleshaw is also admitted to practice law in Maryland, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, acting through Bar Counsel, petitioned this Court under Md. Rule 16-773(b), to impose reciprocal discipline, ie., disbarment. We issued a Show Cause Order,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND OF MARYLAND v. OwrutskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GallagherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PattisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BernsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API