Norcross v. Mahan
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
This is an appeal by the proponent of a will from a decree of a probate court disallowing it. We have before us a finding of material facts and a report of all the evidence. Upon oral evidence the judge found that the decedent signed the instrument, but that one of the supposed attesting witnesses, who signed a few days after the decedent and the others, did not sign in the presence of the testator. Mendell v. Dunbar, 169 Mass. 74. He found, also, that the proponent had failed “to show that the instrument was the voluntary testamentary act of” the decedent. Fleming v. Morrison, 187 Mass. 120.
*404'…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Graustein v. DolanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Berman v. CoakleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Reed v. ReedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Fleming v. MorrisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Bankers Trust Co. v. DockhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Trade Mutual Liability Insurance v. PetersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Stoneham Five Cents Savings Bank v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Ecklund v. EcklundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Murphy v. DonovanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Estey v. GardnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.