Legal Opinion
Estey v. Gardner
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 26, 1935PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
The original plaintiff “Susan E. Shaw, guardian of Earle G. Estey,” filed a motion to substitute as plaintiff “Earle G. Estey, plaintiff, by his guardian, Susan E. Shaw,” and to amend the action at law into a suit in *304equity. The motion was allowed, and a bill was filed praying that a trustee be appointed under a deed of trust of certain premises situated in Canton in the county of Norfolk. There was a further prayer in the bill that the defendants William Gardner, William E. Gardner and Richard Gardner be compelled to account to the plaintiff for the use and occupation of the premises.
The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Giedrewicz v. DonovanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Graustein v. DolanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Albert Richards Co. v. Mayfair, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Roberts v. Lynn Ice Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Burke v. WillardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Boston v. DolanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Stoneham Five Cents Savings Bank v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Worcester Bank & Trust Co. v. EllisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Restighini v. HanaganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Macklin v. MacklinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.