Little v. City of Holyoke
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Tort, for personal injuries. At the trial in the Superior Court, before Maynard, J., the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff; and the defendant alleged exceptions, which appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.
This is an action of tort for injuries suffered by the plaintiff in descending a flight of stairs. At the trial the defendant presented ten requests for instructions. In the argument before us it insists only upon the following, namely : 1. On all the evidence and the pleadings the plaintiff cannot recover, and the jury must find for the defendant. 2. There is no sufficient evidence that the plaintiff was in the exercise of-due care, and the plaintiff cannot recover. 3. There is no sufficient evidence that the defendant was negligent, and the plaintiff cannot recover.
It was agreed at the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Oliver v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Marwedel v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Collins v. Inhabitants of GreenfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bolster v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Main v. LehmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
- Haley v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Wheelock v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Oakley v. RichardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.