Legal Opinion

Stein v. Diamond State Telephone Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided March 27, 1929No. 173PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harrington, J.,

charging the jury:

The defendant company admits that it owed a duty to the plaintiff to correctly list its name, occupation and telephone number in its February and August directories of 1927, and that it negligently violated that duty. Because of that fact, it, also, admits that your verdict must be for the plaintiff for such compensatory damages as naturally and reasonably follow from the negligent acts or omissions committed by it.

The plaintiff claims, however, that he is not only entitled to recover such damages as have been specifically proved by him, but, also, such…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Farrow v. HoffeckerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1906
  2. Giles v. Diamond State Iron Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1887
  3. Petit v. ColmerySuperior Court of Delaware · 1903
  4. Brown v. GreenSuperior Court of Delaware · 1899
  5. Jordan v. Delaware & Atlantic Telegraph & Telephone Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jardel Co., Inc. v. HughesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  2. Warner v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Reynolds v. WillisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  4. Riegel v. Aastad Ex Rel. AastadSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
  5. Indiana Bell Tel. Co., Inc. v. O'BRYANIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API