Legal Opinion

Woolard v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 26, 1956No. 32PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

The judgment presents for decision these questions:

1. May a husband, the owner of land, by deed to himself and wife create an estate by the entireties?

2. If not, may the same result be accomplished by way of estoppel?

It will be noted that the habendum of the deed reads: “Unto the said parties of the first part, their heirs and assigns, in fee simple . . .” Appellants, in their brief, concede this was a clerical error.

The deed, by express language, recites both a desire and a willingness on the part of the party of the first part to create an estate by the entirety. Following this recital are…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stelz v. . ShreckNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Johnson v. . LeavittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Den Ex D. Motley v. . WhitemoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1837
  4. Pegg v. PeggMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Freeman v. BelferSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. L & M GAS COMPANY v. LeggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Finney v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
  4. Morton v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Clark v. CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API