Archibold v. Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs
Pursuant to section 40-6-115(1), 11 C.R.S. (2002), petitioners Arehibold, Galligan, Miller, and Stuelpnagel (Arehibold) appeal a decision of the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) requiring Qwest Communications (Qwest) to pay reparations to customers for violations of the PUC rules. Arehibold alleges that the PUC should have sought civil penalties against Qwest for those violations instead of selecting a reparations remedy. The district court dismissed the appeal, finding the case to be moot because Qwest had already paid the required reparations to customers, in compliance with the PUC’s…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- People v. ThorpeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Gramiger v. CrowleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Van Schaack Holdings, Ltd. v. FulenwiderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- May Department Stores Co. v. State Ex Rel. WoodardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Board of County Commissioners v. Park County Sportsmen's Ranch, LLPSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Woldt v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- Eddie's Leaf Spring Shop & Towing, LLC v. Colorado Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- Stell v. BOULDER COUNTY DEPT. OF SOC. SERV.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Boulder Country Club v. Boulder County Board of CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- City of Aspen v. Kinder Morgan, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.