Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Parke Davis & Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1985No. 82CA1256PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN CISE, Judge.

Plaintiff, Reginald Edwin Peterson, brought this action to recover for neurological injuries allegedly resulting from excessive doses of a prescription drug, dilantin, an anti-convulsant medication used to control seizures. He claimed malpractice against his psychiatrist, Dr. John F. Mar-dock, Mardock’s professional corporation, and Mount Airy Psychiatric Center, the hospital where he had been a patient, and also sought recovery against defendant Parke Davis & Company (Parke Davis), the manufacturer of the drug. His theories of recovery against Parke Davis were negligence and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hiigel v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  2. Hamilton v. HardyColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Bradford v. Bendix-Westinghouse Auto. Air Brake Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Jackson v. Harsco Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  5. Uptain v. Huntington Lab, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Larkin v. Pfizer, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Perlmutter v. United States Gypsum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  3. Knipe v. Smithkline BeechamDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Bee v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  5. O'CONNELL v. Biomet, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API