Legal Opinion
Sandefer v. District Court, City & County of Denver
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided October 19, 1981No. 81SA153PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROVIRA, Justice.
The petitioner, Alice I. Sandefer, seeks relief in the nature of mandamus pursuant to C.A.R. 21. She contends that the trial court erred in ordering the petitioner to submit certain claims to arbitration. We issued a rule to show cause why the requested relief should not be granted, and we now discharge the rule in part and make the rule absolute in part.
This action arises out of certain securities transactions starting in 1974 between the petitioner and Reynolds Securities, Inc. (Reynolds), a securities broker. Pursuant to their dealings, the petitioner executed a standard…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm Beech David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm BeechCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,872 Lila A. Miley v. Oppenheimer & Company, Inc., Anthony L. Geller and John W. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Morrison v. GoodspeedSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,365 Arthur Yale Kavit v. A. L. Stamm & Co., a Co Partnership, and Jack R. LevienCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- City & County of Denver v. District Court Ex Rel. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Kwik Way Stores, Inc. v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Ingold v. AIMCO/Bluffs, L.L.C. ApartmentsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Judd Construction Co. v. Evans Joint VentureSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. BroadnaxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.