Legal Opinion
Richardson v. CVS Corp.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided October 17, 2001No. 1:00-cv-00361PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDGAR, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Linda Lynette Richardson brings the present action against defendants CVS Corporation, d/b/a CVS Pharmacy, Inc. (“CVS”), and Michael Seesholtz. Richardson alleges that defendants violated her rights under the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2615, and terminated her employment in retaliation for her assertion of FMLA rights. She also claims that CVS is liable for discrimination on the basis of plaintiffs race, sex, and age in violation of the Tennessee Human Rights Act (“THRA”), Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 4-21-101 - 903. Finally, plaintiff…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Joey L. Mitchell v. Glenn ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Buckman-Peirson v. BrannonOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- McNeail-Tunstall v. Marshall USADistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2004
- Mitchell v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003