Legal Opinion

National Lead Company v. Wolfe

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 14, 1955No. 13737_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

223 F.2d 195

105 U.S.P.Q. 462

NATIONAL LEAD COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant,

v.

Bernard M. WOLFE and Frederick J. Dannenfelser, Individuals

and Copartners, Doing Business Under the Names and

Styles 'Dutch Paint Co.,' and 'Manning-

Mitchell Paint Co.,' Appellees.

No. 13737.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

May 17, 1955

Rehearing Denied July 14, 1955.

Robert E. Burns, Crimmins, Kent, Draper & Bradley, San Francisco, Cal., James D. Ewing, New York City, Milton Handler, San Francisco, Cal., John B. Henrick, New York City, for appellant.

James M. Naylor, Frank A. Neal, Naylor & Lassagne, San…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lindy Pen Company, Inc. Blackfeet Plastics, Inc., Cross-Appellees v. Bic Pen Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Wolfe v. National Lead Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  3. Benefit Cosmetics LLC v. E.L.F. Cosmetics, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
  4. Plough, Inc. v. Kreis Laboratories, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API