Legal Opinion

Canning v. Livingstone

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided September 9, 1999No. 990079PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtToomey, J.

The plaintiffs, Peter and Gaelen Canning (the “buyers”) have filed suit seeking specific performance of the defendants’ (“the sellers”) acceptance of their offer to purchase a certain residential property in Westport, Massachusetts. The sellers are the owners of equitable and legal title to the property in question. The sellers have filed a motion to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary judgment and the buyers have filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below, both cross-motions for summary judgment are DENIED.

BACKGROUND

The following facts are undisputed for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Poirier v. Town of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. McCarthy v. TobinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marshall v. McDonnellMassachusetts Superior Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API