Legal Opinion

Marshall v. McDonnell

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided August 15, 2000No. 00-1440-DPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Agnes, A.J.

After hearing, and based on a consideration of the affidavits and exhibits in this case, the plaintiffs motions for Lis Pendens and for a preliminary injunction are ALLOWED.

DISCUSSION

The parties signed an “Offer to Purchase Real Estate” that resembles the document which was deemed to be a binding agreement in McCarthy v. Tobin, 429 Mass. 84 (1999). See also Hunneman & Company v. Nigro, 2000 WL 12451 (BMC Appellate Div.) (1 /3/2000) (Somerville, J.). The terms are set forth on a standard, pre-printed form like the form that was considered in the McCarthy case. The offer to purchase…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Packaging Industries Group, Inc. v. CheneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. McCarthy v. TobinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  3. Goren v. Royal Investments Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  4. Canning v. LivingstoneMassachusetts Superior Court · 1999
  5. Foss Manufacturing Co. v. Malden Mills Industries, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sanborn v. HirschMassachusetts Superior Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API