Legal Opinion

City of Birmingham v. Oakland County Supervisors

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1935No. Docket Nos. 96, 97, Calendar Nos. 38,442, 38,443PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The cities of Birmingham and Bloomfield Hills, located in Oakland county, and certain individual taxpayers of each city began suits against the board of supervisors of Oakland county and the State tax commission in November, 1934. Both suits are alike and the bills of complaint were filed for similar purposes.

Plaintiffs allege a complete failure on the part of the board of supervisors of Oakland county to equalize values as a basis for the assessment and collection of taxes for the fiscal year 1934-1935 in accordance with the provisions of 1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 3422, in that there was a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Merrill v. HumphreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Sinclair v. LearnedMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Palmer v. Township of NapoleonMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  4. City of Saginaw v. Consumers' Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Peninsula Iron & Lumber Co. v. Township of Crystal FallsMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Old Colony Railroad v. Assessors of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Twenty-Two Charlotte, Inc. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Moran v. Grosse Pointe TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Helin v. Grosse Pointe TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. City of WakefieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API