Legal Opinion
Helin v. Grosse Pointe Township
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 8, 1951No. Docket 13, Calendar 44,809PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.
Plaintiffs Charles Helin and Lempi Helin,-his wife, reside in the village of Grosse Pointe Park and are the owners of lots 23 and 24, Windmill' Pointe subdivision of private claim 696, and part of private claims 126 and 127, 379 and 570. The Helins purchased this property on land contract from the State land office board in 1945 for $40,000. It is adjacent to that involved in Moran v. Grosse Pointe Township, 317 Mich -248, and has a 200-foot frontage on Lake St. Clair and a depth of 400 feet. A 55 x 105-foot mansion-type stone dwelling and a 4-car garage with 5 rooms on its second floor are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Twenty-Two Charlotte, Inc. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Baker v. State Land Office BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Moran v. Grosse Pointe TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Newport Mining Co. v. City of IronwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- S. S. Kresge Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Antisdale v. City of GalesburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- CAF Investment Co. v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Consumers Power Co. v. Big Prairie TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Harry B. Helmsley v. City of Detroit, Michigan, a Municipal Corporation of the State of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- Dossin's Food Products, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.