Legal Opinion

Gromek v. Gidzela

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 21, 1955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

36 N.J. Super. 212 (1955)

115 A.2d 144

VALENTINE GROMEK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

FRANCES GIDZELA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 13, 1955.

Decided June 21, 1955.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.

Mr. Elias A. Kanter argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Robert J. Rubacky argued the cause for respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

Plaintiff sued to enforce an alleged oral agreement between the late Valentine Gidzela and Frances Gidzela, his wife and defendant herein, to make mutual wills by whose terms plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Deseumeur v. RondelNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909
  2. Tooker v. VreelandNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1921
  3. Tooker v. MapleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
  4. Minogue v. LipmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  5. Ehling v. DiebertNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Woll v. DugasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  2. In Re Hand WillNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API