Tooker v. Vreeland
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On bill, &e.
1Opinion of the Court
Backes, Y. C.
On January 15th, 1914, Reuben Tooker and Emeline, his wife, executed mutual wills, whereby they gave their respective estates to each other for life, and 'as much of tire principal as necessary for his or hei' comfortable maintenance, with remainder, over, in pecuniary legacies, and the residue to certain of their kin, share and share alike. The wills a.re identical except as to a few specific bequests of trinkets. The will of Mrs. Tooker contains a provision, which is not in that of her husband’s, that
“the foregoing legacies [the pecuniary] in this paragraph set forth shall not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Edson v. . ParsonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Hermann v. LudwigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Stevens v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Rastetter v. HoenningerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bank of New York v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Clements v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Woll v. DugasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
- Flohr v. WalkerWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
- Estate of Krampf v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.