Legal Opinion

Hajec v. Novitzke

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1970No. 95PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

On defendants’ appeal three issues are presented:

1. Is the trial court’s finding that the deed from Lang and Novitzke of April 22, 1965, conveyed to Hajee the portion of the property on which the well and trees which Hajee subsequently cut were located not against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence?

2. Did Lang and Novitzke establish that they were entitled to reformation of the deed ?

3. Did Novitzke have probable cause to sign the complaint against Hajee ?

Where was the westerly boundary?

It is clear that Lang and Novitzke intended to convey to Hajee the property described…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Plesko v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. McKinnon v. BenedictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Novo Industrial Corp. v. NissenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Elmer v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Langer v. Stegerwald Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Hondo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  2. Prahl v. BrosamleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  3. Rikkers v. RyanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Dupler v. SeubertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Smith v. OsbornWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API