Legal Opinion

McKinnon v. Benedict

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1968PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

Are the restrictions contained in the letter agreement of August SI, I960, enforceable in equity

The judgment provided not only that the Benedicts be restrained from using the property as a site for a trailer park or campsite, but it also provided that the premises were to be used for no other purpose than as an American Plan summer resort until 1985. The judgment not only makes these restrictions applicable to the Benedicts but also provides that these restrictions “be fully enforcible against any subsequent purchasers of said land, until August 31, 1985.” Even the respondents do not contend…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Seymour v. DelanceyNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
  2. Maitland v. Twin City Aviation Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Mowry v. WoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Mulligan v. AlbertzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Bouchard v. ZetleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Crowley v. KnappWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Pure Milk Products Cooperative v. National Farmers OrganizationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Forest County v. GoodeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Fields Foundation, Ltd. v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  5. Barbian v. Lindner Bros. Trucking Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API