Legal Opinion

Heckart v. A-1 Self Storage, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 2018No. S232322PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCantil-Sakauye, C.J.

In its rental agreements with tenants, defendant A-1 Self Storage, Inc. (A-1) states that it shall not be liable for loss of or damage to a tenant's stored property, and it requires the tenant to obtain insurance for such losses. A-1 also offers an alternative to the requirement that a tenant obtain insurance: in exchange for an additional $10 in rent each month, A-1 will reassume the risk of such losses, up to $2,500. Plaintiff Samuel Heckart contends this alternative constitutes a contract of insurance, and because A-1 is not licensed to sell insurance, its sale of this indemnity agreement…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of La HabraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. California Physicians' Service v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Sweatman v. Department of Veterans AffairsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McHugh v. Protective Life Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Adhav v. Midway Rent A Car, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Preven v. City of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters v. City of Monterey Park, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. Adhav v. Midway Rent A Car, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API